The COVID-19 pandemic hit state budgets notably onerous in 2020, with a $24.11 billion drop in tax income collected from 2019’s ranges. However evaluation of Nationwide Affiliation of Insurance coverage Commissioners (NAIC) information demonstrates that insurance coverage regulation remained a worthwhile income supply for the states, producing $3.29 billion in budgetary surpluses throughout the 50 states and the District of Columbia, up from $2.94 billion in 2019.
In response to information from the Federation of Tax Directors, the states’ complete tax collections fell 2.2% from $1.090 trillion in 2019 to $1.066 trillion in 2020, with Utah (down 12.4%), North Dakota (down 12.8%) and Alaska (down 26.0%) hit hardest of all. Altogether, 31 states and the District of Columbia noticed tax revenues fall, with California alone down a precipitous $16.27 billion.
Against this, the NAIC’s 2020 Insurance coverage Division Sources Report exhibits that state insurance coverage departments collected $3.77 billion in regulatory charges and assessments, up 12.9% from $3.34 billion in 2019. Mixed with the $190.6 million in fines and penalties departments collected (roughly flat from 2019) and $1.07 billion of miscellaneous “different” income, state insurance coverage departments generated $5.03 billion of complete revenues, greater than 3 times the $1.60 billion they really spent on insurance coverage regulation.
That $3.43 billion of “regulatory surplus” (up 11.8% from $3.07 billion in 2019) should be weighed towards the $140.8 million in funds that insurance coverage departments drew from their states’ common funds, itself a 5.4% enhance over 2019. However even after subtracting that complete, insurance coverage regulation remained a revenue middle for states, with $3.29 billion of surplus revenues, up 12.1% from $2.94 billion in 2019.
A Tax By Any Different Title
The revenues collected by insurance coverage departments—whether or not they be charges and assessments, fines and penalties, or funds from different sources—shouldn’t be confused with the taxes that states assess on insurance coverage premiums. All states acquire taxes on the premiums written inside that state and most additionally acquire “retaliatory” taxes, charging out-of-state insurers the speed set by their domiciliary state whether it is increased than the speed within the jurisdiction the place the premium is written. The existence of retaliatory taxes pushes most insurers to domicile in comparatively low-tax jurisdictions. The states with the very best and lowest efficient premium tax charges in 2020 are displayed within the graph above.
Premium and retaliatory taxes are deposited in a state’s common fund, simply as different gross sales taxes are. Kansas is a partial exception, on this respect, because the Kansas Insurance coverage Division retains 1% of the premium taxes collected, which it reviews as “different” income. As demonstrated within the graph under, premium taxes have been a secure and largely recession-proof income supply for the states, rising 61.7% over the previous decade from $14.82 billion in 2011 to $23.97 billion in 2020.
However as famous, the charges and fines collected by insurance coverage departments considerably exceed the quantities strictly wanted to assist regulatory actions. In 2020, simply seven state insurance coverage departments (North Carolina, Arizona, Maryland, Hawaii, Minnesota, Michigan and Tennessee) raised much less in income than the mixture of what they spent on regulation and what they obtained from their state’s common fund. In truth, the whole quantity the states spent on insurance coverage regulation in 2020 ($1.36 billion) represented simply 31.8% of the revenues that insurance coverage regulators raised.
The remainder of the funds—the so-called “regulatory surplus”—quantity to a hidden tax on insurance coverage corporations, which is finally handed on to customers within the type of costlier protection.
Following the Cash
State insurance coverage departments differ in how their budgets are structured and what occurs to the funds raised by regulators. A slim majority of states (27 in all) make use of “devoted” budgets, by which revenues move right into a separate account that’s carried over from 12 months to 12 months. If revenues flowing into the account exceed the funds appropriated by the state legislature for that 12 months, the surplus is carried over into future years and could also be used to cowl future departmental shortfalls.
In principle, the good thing about a devoted funding system is to cut back cyclical fluctuations in income. For instance, a division may acquire massive fines and penalties that function a one-time windfall. For instance, Texas reported that $19.2 million of the $67.6 million of fines and penalties the state collected in 2020 had been from a single entity, whereas Vermont famous that one massive settlement accounted for $1.8 million of the $2.2 million in fines it reported.
A devoted funding funds additionally ought to theoretically mitigate any want for a division to both minimize expenditures or name on common funds from a state’s treasury. However because the desk under illustrates, there are some discrepancies between that theoretical account and the way departments with devoted budgets carry out in the actual world.
As is obvious, the overwhelming majority of devoted funds states—24 of the 27—have raised extra in revenues than they’ve spent on insurance coverage regulation in every of the previous 5 years. Two different states, Hawaii and Michigan, have recorded shortfalls in every of the previous 5 years. Solely Maine and Maryland really carried out because the theoretical account would predict, working shortfalls in some years and surpluses in others.
Furthermore, in some circumstances, the surpluses are really huge. The cumulative $2.81 billion five-year surplus generated by New York, or the $1.09 billion five-year surplus generated by Texas, can not moderately be characterised as a prudential “rainy-day fund.” Each states are clearly overcharging insurers and insurance coverage producers for regulatory and licensing charges by an enormous quantity.
Additionally undercutting the theoretical account is that 4 of the states with devoted insurance coverage division budgets nonetheless additionally obtained at the very least some funds from their states’ treasuries prior to now 5 years, regardless of all 4 posting surpluses every year. Two of these departments have obtained solely very restricted common funds, with none in 2020. (Oklahoma obtained $1.6 million basically funds in 2016, however none prior to now 4 years. Washington State obtained a mixed roughly $500,000 in 2016 and 2017, however none prior to now three years.)
California, which frequently attracts a small portion of its annual funds from the state treasury, has taken $21.6 million basically funds over the previous 5 years. The true outlier is North Carolina. Regardless of posting a mixed $35.4 million in surpluses the previous 5 years, the division additionally drew a whopping $209.8 million basically funds from the state over the identical interval.
Solely 11 states drew any common funds from their state treasuries in 2020, however they got here from all 4 of the funds varieties recognized by the NAIC: devoted (coated above), quasi-dedicated (extra revenues are deposited yearly within the state’s common account), common (all working funds are allotted straight by the state) and “mixture” (the division’s budgeting guidelines make use of a mixture of two or extra of the opposite varieties).
Whereas Mississippi and South Dakota are the one states that draw 100% of their funding from the final fund, solely Mississippi is formally categorized as a “common funding” state, a change took impact in 2017. Notably, whereas Mississippi does proceed to gather regulatory charges and assessments from corporations, as of 2020, it now not reviews such funds, that are all deposited within the state’s common account.
Mississippi’s failure to report the regulatory charges and assessments it collects however, for the 23 states (and the District of Columbia) that don’t make use of devoted budgets, funds surpluses generated by insurance coverage regulation serve much more straight as a tax. Extra funds are normally, however not all the time, deposited within the state’s treasury. There are some partial exceptions. Arkansas permits the division to hold over extra funds for one 12 months, however surrenders any surpluses to the final fund each different 12 months. Alaska and North Dakota each enable their departments to hold over $1 million to the next 12 months, with the rest transferred to the final fund.
Amongst states with out devoted funds, solely Arizona and Tennessee spent extra on insurance coverage regulation than they generated in revenues in 2020. Collectively, this cohort of jurisdictions raised $2.87 billion in income. Web of the $454.4 million they spent on regulation and the $83.5 million they drew basically funds, these states loved a cumulative $2.33 billion windfall from insurance coverage regulation in 2020.
Beneath, I checklist the states so as of surplus from insurance coverage regulation (revenues internet of each the division’s working prices and any common funds transferred from the state’s treasury) expressed as a proportion of that state’s departmental funds.